Out of the people in my group, I think my two favorite posts were George's and Alli's. They both had very original ideas about what their posts were about, and they both executed them very well.
In Alli's post she including a poem in her post, which was not only a great poem, but really related and described her book. She read between the lines, and had a whole new perspective on the book. Instead of talking about the main plot, she talked about the relationships in the book, showing more than what you would know from just reading the blurb on the back of the book. Just from reading her poem, and her descriptions of the book I really had no idea it was a mystery, I thought it was just a regular book about relationships. I have not read this book, but I was really able to see what she was talking about.
In George's post he compared his book to another book. He gave great background information for each book, using a lot of text evidence. There was a lot of information on each book before he compared the two books, so before reading the paragraph with the similarities between the two books, you already knew what they were. He really organized the post well, and provided all of the background information and text evidence for each book he needed to make his point clear.
No comments:
Post a Comment